eosl.ai
homereplacements4948 Series
Migration guide · Cisco

Cisco Catalyst 4948 Series Replacement — What Cisco Recommends

Cisco support for the Cisco Catalyst 4948 Series ended Jul 2018 — unsupported units need a plan. Cisco's own end-of-life bulletin names the successor below — quoted from the source, with the successor's live support status where EOSL.ai tracks it.

The Cisco-named replacement

Cisco Catalyst 4948E / 4948E-F

named in the Cisco EOL bulletin ↗ as the migration path.

Cisco Catalyst 4948E / 4948E-F is not yet tracked on EOSL.ai — no vendor end-of-life notice has been captured for it, which is typical of current products.

Cisco Catalyst 4948 Series lifecycle dates

SKU groupEnd of saleEOSL / last supportSource
Switch hardwareAug 2013Jul 2018bulletin ↗

Per-part-number replacement mapping (1)

As listed in the Cisco bulletin's migration table for each part number.

End-of-life partDescriptionBulletin-listed replacement
WS-C4948WS-C4948E / WS-C4948E-F
Replacement guidance on this page is quoted from Cisco's official end-of-life bulletin (linked above). EOSL.ai sells no hardware and lists no paid placements — this is the manufacturer's stated path, and third-party maintenance past the cutoff is also an option.

Migration questions

What is the replacement for the Cisco Catalyst 4948 Series?

Cisco's end-of-life bulletin names Cisco Catalyst 4948E / 4948E-F as the recommended migration path for the Cisco Catalyst 4948 Series. The exact wording and any per-part-number mapping are in the linked bulletin.

Is the Cisco Catalyst 4948 Series end of life?

Cisco support for the Cisco Catalyst 4948 Series ended Jul 2018 — unsupported units need a plan. Full lifecycle dates by part number: https://eosl.ai/system/cisco-catalyst-4948/.

Is there a per-part-number replacement mapping for the 4948 Series?

Yes — the bulletin maps replacements at the part-number level for 1 SKU (for example WS-C4948 → WS-C4948E / WS-C4948E-F). The full table is on this page.

Do I have to buy the Cisco-recommended replacement?

No. The bulletin's named successor is Cisco's suggested path, not an obligation. Teams also keep 4948 Series units running under third-party maintenance after the support cutoff, migrate to a different vendor, or run low-criticality units to failure with the risk documented. See the support-options guide for the trade-offs.