When a vendor retires a product, its end-of-life bulletin often names the successor. EOSL.ai pulls those together here — 11 models with a source-backed migration path, most urgent first. Each links to the bulletin behind it.
| End-of-life model | Vendor-recommended replacement | End of sale | EOSL / last support | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cisco Catalyst 4948 Series | Cisco Catalyst 4948E / 4948E-F | Aug 2013 | Jul 2018 | Past EOSL |
| Cisco Catalyst 3750-X Series | Cisco Catalyst 3650 / 3850 Series | Oct 2016 | Oct 2021 | Past EOSL |
| Cisco ASA 5500-X Series Firewalls | Cisco Firepower 2100 Series / Cisco Firepower 1000 Series | Aug 2017 – Aug 2021 | Aug 2022 – Aug 2026 | Past EOSL |
| Cisco Catalyst 3850 Series | Cisco Catalyst 9300 Series / Cisco Catalyst 9300/9300X and 9500 | Oct 2020 – Apr 2022 | Oct 2025 – Apr 2027 | Past EOSL |
| Cisco ISR 800 Series | Cisco IR1101 / Catalyst IR1821 Rugged Series / Cisco ISR 1100 / 900 Series | Nov 2020 – Jan 2022 | Nov 2025 – Jan 2027 | Past EOSL |
| Cisco MDS 9700 Series | Cisco MDS 9700 V2/V3 configurations (Fabric-3) | Sep 2021 | Sep 2026 | Ending soon |
| Cisco Catalyst 3650 Series | Cisco Catalyst 9300L Series / Cisco Catalyst 9300L Mini (C9300LM) | Oct 2021 – May 2023 | Oct 2026 – May 2028 | Ending soon |
| Cisco Firepower 4110 Series | Cisco Firepower 4112 Series | Jan 2022 | Jan 2027 | Ending soon |
| Cisco Aironet 1850 Series | Cisco Catalyst 9115AX Series Access Points | May 2022 | Apr 2027 | Ending soon |
| Cisco Nexus 3110 Series | Cisco Nexus 9300 (93180YC-FX3 / 93108TC-FX3P / 9336C-FX2) | Aug 2022 | Aug 2027 | Supported |
| Cisco UCS B200 M6 Series | Cisco UCS X-Series (X9508 chassis / X210c compute nodes) | Dec 2025 | Dec 2030 | Supported |
Each one is taken from the vendor's own end-of-life bulletin for the retired product — the "migration options" or "recommended replacement" section. EOSL.ai does not invent successors; a model only appears here when its vendor named one. Open the model's page to see the exact bulletin.
Not necessarily. It is the manufacturer's suggested upgrade path and a sensible default, but the best replacement depends on your requirements, budget, and whether you want to stay with the same vendor. Some teams use end-of-life as the moment to re-evaluate. Treat it as the starting point, not the only option.
Many end-of-life products have no vendor-named successor, or the vendor points to a whole product line rather than a single model. Check the model's page for its lifecycle detail and options; if you're weighing a move, the EOSL.ai <a href="/support-options/">support-options guide</a> walks through migrate vs. third-party maintenance vs. run-to-failure.