eosl.ai
homereplacementsC250 M2 Series
Migration guide · Cisco

Cisco UCS C250 M2 Series Replacement — What Cisco Recommends

Cisco support for the Cisco UCS C250 M2 Series ended Nov 2017 — unsupported units need a plan. Cisco's own end-of-life bulletin names the successor below — quoted from the source, with the successor's live support status where EOSL.ai tracks it.

The Cisco-named replacement

UCSC-C240-M3S2

named as the replacement part number in the Cisco EOL bulletin — named in the Cisco EOL bulletin ↗ as the migration path.

UCSC-C240-M3S2 is not yet tracked on EOSL.ai — no vendor end-of-life notice has been captured for it, which is typical of current products.

Cisco UCS C250 M2 Series lifecycle dates

SKU groupEnd of saleEOSL / last supportSource
Switch hardwareNov 2012Nov 2017bulletin ↗

Per-part-number replacement mapping (1)

As listed in the Cisco bulletin's migration table for each part number.

End-of-life partDescriptionBulletin-listed replacement
R250-2480805WUCSC-C240-M3S2
Replacement guidance on this page is quoted from Cisco's official end-of-life bulletin (linked above). EOSL.ai sells no hardware and lists no paid placements — this is the manufacturer's stated path, and third-party maintenance past the cutoff is also an option.

Migration questions

What is the replacement for the Cisco UCS C250 M2 Series?

Cisco's end-of-life bulletin names UCSC-C240-M3S2 as the recommended migration path for the Cisco UCS C250 M2 Series. The exact wording and any per-part-number mapping are in the linked bulletin.

Is the Cisco UCS C250 M2 Series end of life?

Cisco support for the Cisco UCS C250 M2 Series ended Nov 2017 — unsupported units need a plan. Full lifecycle dates by part number: https://eosl.ai/system/cisco-ucs-c250-m2/.

Is there a per-part-number replacement mapping for the C250 M2 Series?

Yes — the bulletin maps replacements at the part-number level for 1 SKU (for example R250-2480805W → UCSC-C240-M3S2). The full table is on this page.

Do I have to buy the Cisco-recommended replacement?

No. The bulletin's named successor is Cisco's suggested path, not an obligation. Teams also keep C250 M2 Series units running under third-party maintenance after the support cutoff, migrate to a different vendor, or run low-criticality units to failure with the risk documented. See the support-options guide for the trade-offs.

Other Cisco UCS migration guides