HPE HP 10/100 PoE Injector (JD483B) Replacement — What HPE Recommends
HPE support for the HPE HP 10/100 PoE Injector (JD483B) ended Jan 2018 — unsupported units need a plan. HPE's own end-of-life bulletin names the successor below — quoted from the source, with the successor's live support status where EOSL.ai tracks it.
The HPE-named replacement
named as the replacement part in the HPE end-of-sale notice — named in the HPE EOL bulletin ↗ as the migration path.
J9407B is not yet tracked on EOSL.ai — no vendor end-of-life notice has been captured for it, which is typical of current products.
HPE HP 10/100 PoE Injector (JD483B) lifecycle dates
| SKU group | End of sale | EOSL / last support | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| HP 10/100 PoE Injector (JD483B) | Jan 2013 | Jan 2018 | bulletin ↗ |
Per-part-number replacement mapping (1)
As listed in the HPE bulletin's migration table for each part number.
| End-of-life part | Description | Bulletin-listed replacement |
|---|---|---|
| JD483B | HP Single-Port 802.3af PoE In-Line PS | J9407B |
Migration questions
What is the replacement for the HPE HP 10/100 PoE Injector (JD483B)?
HPE's end-of-life bulletin names J9407B as the recommended migration path for the HPE HP 10/100 PoE Injector (JD483B). The exact wording and any per-part-number mapping are in the linked bulletin.
Is the HPE HP 10/100 PoE Injector (JD483B) end of life?
HPE support for the HPE HP 10/100 PoE Injector (JD483B) ended Jan 2018 — unsupported units need a plan. Full lifecycle dates by part number: https://eosl.ai/system/hpe-10-100-poe-injector-jd483b/.
Is there a per-part-number replacement mapping for the 10/100 PoE Injector (JD483B)?
Yes — the bulletin maps replacements at the part-number level for 1 SKU (for example JD483B → J9407B). The full table is on this page.
Do I have to buy the HPE-recommended replacement?
No. The bulletin's named successor is HPE's suggested path, not an obligation. Teams also keep 10/100 PoE Injector (JD483B) units running under third-party maintenance after the support cutoff, migrate to a different vendor, or run low-criticality units to failure with the risk documented. See the support-options guide for the trade-offs.